I seldom write about movies but I have stated on many occasions here that I am a history buff. The last local historical drama I watched was "Luna." The film was on the life of Gen. Antonio Luna and it certainly contained many of what I've read about him from various sources. That includes the events leading to Luna's assassination. These supposed to have involved then Pres. Emilio Aguinaldo who is depicted to have approved of the assassination.
Fast forward to the more recent film about Pres. Manual L. Quezon, which I watched with my daughter. While I noticed a lot of details from the articles written by Ambeth Ocampo (I have read his books.), there seems to have been a lot of fiction injected in the story such as those concerning major characters in the film who are not actual people in history. I am referring to the persons depicted as Quezon's friend and the latter's daughter who was a film maker in the movie. An 'about face' from the Luna movie (note that Quezon is by the same director as Luna.) are parts that appear to be sympathetic towards Aguinaldo. Quezon is the villain here and not Aguinaldo.
I thought the film was thought provoking in that it managed to ruffle some feathers. Quezon is portrayed as scheming, unfaithful and power-hungry. Whether this is true or false is left for the audience to decide. Unfortunately, most people in the audiences of theaters may have scarce information on the characters most especially Quezon prior to watching the film so it is likely that many would consider what's being narrated as truth. That is where the problem lies in such manner of storytelling. It is a form of sensationalism, even misinformation along the lines of "fake news". Hopefully, the more trustworthy people doing work on our history will be able to explain these and people will listen and believe the experts rather than rely on the movie for facts.
-
-