I chanced upon this watch on auction and casually put in a bid knowing the bids will eventually escalate and be unacceptable to me. I actually forgot about it and didn't think about checking what happened as the deadline expired. It was the next day when I checked my phone when I saw a message informing me that I won the bid. Though it was a pleasant surprise, it also meant I had to shell out some money to pay for the watch. Charge this again to experience...
The watch is among those sought after by collectors, especially those into Seiko watches and chronographs. I had wanted to have one of these monopushers (single button controlling the chronograph functions of the watch) that is supposed to be Seiko's first foray into chronographs. The first is actually the caliber 5719, which didn't have a date complication. This watch, a 5717, came a bit later and with a date feature.
 |
| This model has a black dial and a metal bezel |
 |
| Side view showing the crown and chronograph button (often referred to as a monopusher) |
 |
| The other side view also showing the overall good condition of the watch |
 |
| Case back showing the Olympic logo, the model ad the serial number. The serial number indicates the watch to have been manufactured in April 1966, which is 2 years after the Tokyo Olympics. |
 |
| Close up of the dial showing no lumes and no model number at the bottom. I would like to assume that the model number has faded due to age rather than this being a replacement dial. |
 |
| Wrist shot after I took the watch for a routine check with my watchman in a mall near our home. |
 |
| Here it is with another watch commemorating the 1964 Tokyo Olympics. I have another Olympic World Timer but with a black dial. These models are milestones in Seiko's history in wathcmaking. |
 |
| Wrist shot the first time I wore the watch |
I don't have a photo of the movement but assume that it has a genuine Cal. 5717 inside the case. The watch is manually wound and is supposed to have a storage of 40 hours when it was first issued in the 1960s. So far, I've recorded 34 and 40 hours on separate occasions. There's quite a variance on the average for these two recordings. Perhaps I didn't wind the watch properly or the conditions weren't as favorable as possible for the maximum potential? I will post again on the results and perhaps a few more photos with my other Olympics watch from Seiko.
-
[Updates: I've monitored the watch and it consistently ran for 40 hours every time it was fully wound. I did these over a week and it didn't gain or lose significantly over that period. -08 Oct 2025]